“I am very pleased
to be here in Oslo for this conference.
We welcome this initiative and are confident that the discussions
here toady will be an effective means to help to take the
peace process forward.
As some of you may know,
I have long been a friend of Sri Lanka and I continue to
try to visit the island regularly. I well remember the dark
days of the late 1990s when I was living in Colombo. Then,
there didn’t seem to be any sign of light at the end
of the tunnel. The change over the past few months has been
truly remarkable and all of the partners are to be complimented
on their commitment to the peace process. My colleague Mr.Lysholt
– Hansen representing the EU Presidency will elaborate
on the recent initiatives undertaken by the Council in support
of this process.
We fully agree with Norway’s view that now that unprecedented
international attention is focused on the peace effort,
we must ensure that donor support can continue and succeed.
Since the signing of the
cease –fire agreement in February, we have intensified
our contacts with the Government of Norway and the Government
of Sri Lanka . Already this year, the Commission
has been able to find extra funding for Sri Lanka this year,
where our commitment will total C17.3 million
.
For example, we are using
the Rapid Reaction Mechanism to fund specific action foreseen
in the cease-fire agreement itself – establishing
electricity supply to the A9 checkpoints and the rehabilitation
of the Batticaloa rail line – as well as funding for
the Peace Secretariat and the Human Rights Commision and
through increased allocations to humanitarian assistance
programmes.
ECHO, the Commission’s
Humanitarian Aid Office, reacted quickly to this positive
political development , providing support to the population
and to those internally displaced people living in the conflict
affected areas. ECHO funds, among other activities,mine
field surveys and fencing , mine awareness programmes, medical
assistance in Mullaitivu and Mannar districts, supply of
temporary shelters and basic agricultural seeds and tools
for those who have already returned to their places of origin.
One other areawhere we are anxious to be able to increase
our funding is de-mining. It is for this reason that we
hope to hear something positive soon, perhaps today, from
the Prime Minister, on Sri Lanka’s position on the
Ottawa Convention.
Signature of the Ottawa
Convention would mean that we could also start engaging
in practical de-mining, a vital element in facilitating
the gradual return.
Distinguished Delegates,
We are invited by our Norwegian
hosts to use this conference to pledge support for immediate
humanitarian and rehabilitation activities. In this context,
I am pleased to inform you of the following three initiatives
undertaken by the European Commission:
First,
We will continue the exceptional assistance granted to Sri
Lanka in 2002 also in 2003. As of now, I can confirm a peace
process related package, ranging from further humanitarian
assistance over de- mining to developmental activities of
C 17.5 million for 2003.
Secondly,
we have agreed in principle with the Government to utilize
counterpart funds worth an equivalent of 20M C in
support of the “Unified Assistance Scheme
in support of returning refugees.
Thirdly,
we are already preparing for the conference in Tokyo
in Spring 2003 where we hope to be able
to announce a further significant pledge to the
peace process. In this context, the conference documents
and today’s deliberations will provide valuable guidance
for the best line to take. We would certainly like to hear
more about the proposed peace fund and how it is intended
to work. We look forward to participating fully in discussions
on the setting up of such a fund for Sri Lanka.
Distinguished Delegates ,
The peace negotiations have
led the Government of Sri Lanka to begin a serious study
of various federal and other systems of government around
the world. We know that there has been interest in the German
federal system, as well as devolution within the UK. Later
this week the legal adviser to the Peace Secretariat will
be in Brussels to look at the Belgian system of regional
government
.
We hope that we will be able to identify some way to enable
the Commisssion to extend to the LTTE the possibility to
look at the different European government models as part
of the process of expanding EU dialogue with all involved
in the peace process.
I have begun to notice advertisements
for holidays in Sri Lanka appearing in the European press.
New tourism and airline offices are being set up in Europe.
I noticed that a cricket test between Pakistan and Australia
was played in Sri Lanka-This is a fantastic feather in cap
of Sri Lanka that it was considered as a venue for such
an event .
These are the green shoots
of the success of the peace process. Donor governments cannot
bring private investment to Sri Lanka.But we encourage it,
and we can support the process of bringing stability and
prosperity to Sri Lanka.
It is easy to lose sight of the fact that although the brunt
of the conflict has been borne in the North and East, there
has been, and continues to be , considerable suffering and
hardship in the rest of the country. Donors need to be aware
of the need to provide project assistance with a broad geographical
spread in order that the concrete benefits of the peace
process can be clearly demonstrated, and appreciated, of
all sections of Sri Lankan society.
Distinguished Delegates,
Let me put my environmental
hat on for a moment. The conflict has had some devastating
impact on the environment in the island. Now with the peace
process up and running I would also make a plea that in
the process of reconstruction and economic regeneration,
concern for the environment is not neglected.
Peace will bring prosperity,
economic growth, and new job opportunities. If not properly
managed this may put strains on Sri Lanka’s natural
resources. I read a report just recently that stated in
the past 200 years Sri Lanka has lost 95% of its tropical
forest. This makes the remaining 5% particularly precious.
Sri Lanka still has a fantastic bio-diversity- this must
continue to be protected, and developed as an asset. When
considering the country’s greater energy needs, we
must ensure that the most appropriate technology is used;
that proper conservation measures are put in place and enforced.
Improved management of water resource and sustainable management
of other natural resources should be a vital concern for
the planners and all actors in Sri Lanka .It is in Sri Lanka’s
interest that best practices in environmental protection
and sustainable development concerns be incorporated right
from the start in the reconstruction and development phase
that the country is entering.
On all these fronts, Sri Lanka can certainly count on the
co-operation of the European Union. “
|