On a map of the
world Sri Lanka is small even seemingly insignificant.
Yet this conference today demonstrates that we have
many significant friends across the world deeply committed
to the restoration of peace in my country.
Not least the Japanese
nation to whom we are highly indebted for hosting
this conference. My thanks go, in particular, to the
Prime Minister of Japan His Excellency Junichiro Koizumi
for organising the conference and for so graciously
attending today. I would also like to thank Her Excellency
Yoriko Kawaguchi Minister for Foreign Affairs, and
Ambassador Yasushi Akashi Japan’s Special Envoy
for Peace and Development in Sri Lanka. Their continued
support and inspiration reflects our friendship with
the Japanese people which goes back many decades.
It is one that I hope personally will grow ever deeper
in the years to come.
I would also like
to thank the United States for their support both
as a co-chair of this conference and for their backing
of the pre-conference seminar in Washington. The importance
the United States places upon this conference is evident
by the presence of Deputy Secretary of State Richard
Armitage.
That we should have
two more co-chairs from the European Union and from
Norway further demonstrates how fortunate we should
count ourselves.
Although there are
many friends of Sri Lanka in this room today I must
make special mention of the work of the Royal Norwegian
Government in their role as facilitators of the peace
process. They have an international reputation for
such work and every day they demonstrate their commitment
to peace. Although there must be moments when they
would like to feel a little more appreciated by some
of the people they seek to help. For our part we look
forward to their continued participation as facilitators
in this important process.
Mr Chairman, Ladies
and Gentlemen, 18 months ago the people of Sri Lanka
gave a mandate to a new Government to recapture lost
opportunities. They charged us with the job of solving
some serious challenges.
At the time of independence
we were a literate, prosperous and peaceful country
and in many respects setting the pace in Asia. Many
countries in South East Asia talked of emulating Sri
Lanka as they built their own economies.
Today we are no longer
the nation we were. But the people of Sri Lanka are
courageous and determined. They will tolerate a lot.
Nevertheless they had grown weary of the lack of success
of our country. Being below par was not good enough
for them. So they set us the task of delivering in
three critical areas.
The first was to lay
a foundation for a lasting peace. We had become a
divided nation filled with ethnic hatred and bitterness,
a nation at war destroying itself and its people.
The second was to
rebuild an economy which was on its knees. The people
recognised that our whole economic way of life had
to be restructured and reformed. Nor could the economy
sustain an expensive and meaningless war any longer.
We had to place ourselves in a position where we could
compete and prosper in the newly globalised world.
The third was to resolve
the problems of a deeply politically divided society.
One where over the past fifty or more years the political
gap has widened. Where consensus between the political
parties was more words than deed and where elections
had become increasingly violent and discordant.
Unlike previous elections
the people went further by electing a new government
with an incumbent President who was leader of the
Peoples Alliance. They gave a loud and clear signal
that they wanted the political parties to bury their
differences and start working together.
In the Peace Process
the role of the President had been significant. In
a courageous move it was she who had started the process
and had appointed the Norwegians as facilitators.
Today we appreciate the way in which she continues
to support the peace process in principle. It is with
such support that we persist in working on building
bridges of understanding.
When we took office
the rationale behind our thinking on the Peace Process
was based on humanitarian needs. We decided that to
wait for a political settlement before rehabilitating
the North and the East was unacceptable. The hatred
and distrust between the two sides was too deep seated
and would take years to resolve. We agreed that whilst
negotiating, if the funds could be found, we should
try to give back the lives to our people in those
war torn areas.
This was, of course,
a high risk strategy because in peace processes elsewhere
donors had always wanted to see a peace agreement
before committing funds. It was even more high risk
because with every peace process there are ups and
downs. There would be times when the talks reached
an impasse and progress would be slow. Then how would
the donors react?
We are in one such
impasse at the moment. The timing is unfortunate but
I believe that progress has been sufficient over the
past fifteen months since the Permanent Ceasefire
Agreement for you the donors to see that both sides
are genuine about the ultimate outcome.
That the LTTE are
not here today is a matter of sadness because the
ultimate losers could be the people of the North and
the East. Especially since this conference was to
be a partnership effort between the LTTE and the Government.
However I believe that the peace process is mature
enough for you to see that we can and will move forward
very soon. An encouraging sign is the way in which
contact is still being maintained at grass roots level
and the opportunities for trust building continue.
By now you will also
have recognised that this is a responsible government.
One which will continue to find innovative ways to
look after all the people of our country regardless,
and that very firmly includes the Tamil people. We
will work for the development of the North East in
partnership with the LTTE. We also have a responsibility
to safeguard the interests of all the communities
in the North East
When the Peace Talks
start again then of course we have to continue the
process of finding an ultimate solution almost certainly
within the framework of a Federal state. Bearing in
mind our determination to deal with humanitarian issues
from the very beginning we have looked at ways of
delivering a reconstruction, redevelopment and rehabilitation
programme.
The actions of the
LTTE in the past few weeks has demonstrated what we
too were realising. It was clear that the structures
we had put in place were too cumbersome and too distant
from the people to be acceptable or to react quickly
enough. The people needed a much faster response than
the Government was able to deliver.
We designed a new
structure with the multilateral agencies and the donor
community. We did this for two good reasons. The first
was that we could see the donor community were as
frustrated as the Government and the LTTE at the lack
of implementation. The second was that from the very
beginning we had realised that any solution to our
particular problems were resolvable only with the
widest possible involvement by you the donor community.
Regrettably, so far, we have not managed to reconcile
our proposals with the thinking of the LTTE.
Whilst talking about
the donor community I would like to thank those agencies
who put so much time and energy into preparing the
North East Needs Assessment paper. This project was
prepared through a partnership between the Government,
the LTTE and the International Community. The delivery
will also be implemented through a partnership between
the parties. The United Nations, The World Bank and
the Asian Development Bank who have graced this conference
have worked tirelessly on this assessment. I know
that they will be presenting their findings during
the course of the conference.
Meanwhile it is clear
that much political work still has to be done. The
North East Needs Assessment gives us the opportunity
to carry forward the programme of reconstruction,
rehabilitation and reconciliation. With your commitment
of the resources needed to carry out this programme
we can bring much needed relief to the people of the
North and the East. We want to use that money in partnership
and cooperation with the LTTE to see all our communities
benefit in this war torn area.
Meanwhile the differences
between us over an administrative structure are not
that far apart.
In Oslo both the government
and the LTTE jointly agreed a significant statement
and I quote:
“ ... the parties agreed to explore a solution
founded on the principle of internal self-determination
in areas of historical habitation of the Tamil-speaking
peoples, based on a federal structure within a united
Sri Lanka. The parties acknowledged that the solution
has to be acceptable to all communities”
It is now important that we develop a roadmap with
milestones to get there. In this context we would
need to set up an innovative provisional administrative
structure. It will be responsible for the Reconstruction
and Development of the North East and the administrative
aspects of the transitional process. It will have
to achieve the following objectives:
Ø to be efficient,
transparent and accountable;
Ø safeguard the interests of all communities
in the North East;
Ø enable the LTTE to play a significant role;
Ø and not to be in conflict with the laws of
Sri Lanka
The powers of this
provisional administrative structure will include,
· rebuilding the war damaged
economy;
· reconstruction
· resettlement, and
· providing effective delivery
of essential services
so as to uplift the lives of the people.
In order to move forward, it is of vital importance
that a Muslim delegation should participate in the
Peace Talk to articulate the concerns of the Muslims.
We will introduce constitutional reforms when we have
negotiated a final political solution, which we are
fully committed to take to the people of Sri Lanka
through a referendum for the ultimate decision.
In addition, given
the lack of confidence between the two sides it is
essential that the international donor community identify
ways and means through which they could meaningfully
underpin this process. It is important that we now
think introspectively of the way forward beyond Tokyo
and as to how the donor community can stay engaged.
Tokyo marks the end of one phase and the beginning
of another in Sri Lanka’s search for peace and
economic reconstruction.
In the next few days,
at the end of our deliberations it is important that
all of us present here re-dedicate ourselves in a
resolute manner and with renewed vigour.
This Government will
continue to do its best to approach the problems with
sincerity and determination and with full consideration
of the wishes of the people. To do anything less would
be to derogate our responsibility to the people.
Moving to the economy,
at the time of independence our economy was top of
the Asian economic league table. Today it is at the
bottom. Eighteen months ago we took on an economy
that was close to collapse. For too many years as
a nation we had plucked the fruit from the tree before
the tree had grown.
We had to take hard
decisions. The people had suffered much poverty and
hardship over the years and to do nothing would have
resulted in a worsening of their living standards.
The one good piece of news was that our social indices
were much better than in many countries. The imbalance
was between the social indices and the economic position.
For this reason we were able to put in place a policy
which, in the short term is deeply painful, but which
in the long term will re-stabilise our economy.
You will all understand
that this is not the politicians dream position. As
politicians we like to give the people what they want,
but for us the choices were limited. The state was
running too many antiquated, inefficient and overstaffed
institutions. This coupled with the costs of conflict
diverted resources away from essential services such
as education, health and housing. We were living beyond
our means.
Reinstating a strong
fiscal policy was imperative yet painful. Reforming
and liberalising the economy was necessary. Creating
the environment to allow our entrepreneurs to compete
in the global market place was a must. But most significantly
it was essential that we brought jobs and prosperity
to all our people.
Around two thirds
of the economic activity of Sri Lanka is conducted
in the Western Province where about 5.4 million of
our 19 million people live. Elsewhere in the country
the infrastructure is poor, the facilities are poor
and our people suffer from poverty.
That is why we instigated
the Regaining Sri Lanka programme. For many reasons
our people in the South have suffered in unique ways
to those in the North and the East. But the suffering
is no less painful.
That is why we seek
your help in the short and medium term in the North
and the East. To rebuild our war-torn areas through
the North East Needs Assessment. Whilst in the medium
to long-term we rebuild the whole of our country through
‘Regaining Sri Lanka’ to give the lives
back to the people who have suffered so much.
We are not looking
for hand outs, rather for a hand up. With your help
we hope to have the resources to rebuild our country
and turn it into a prosperous and modern society where
poverty is reduced to the minimum and where our people
can live comfortably.
The third issue on
which I touched earlier was the question of the politically
divided society. Ask any Sri Lankan and they will
tell you that they are embarrassed by the conduct
and the antics of some of the politicians. Elections
have become opportunities to offer everything to everyone.
Political promises always outweigh the ability to
deliver. Elections have also become violent affairs
where all too often Government used the mechanisms
of state to ensure re-election.
The bitterness and
rivalry between the two main political parties has
spilled over on many occasions in the past. When a
new Government has come in to office, or should I
say power, good professional people have been thrown
out of jobs to make way for political appointees.
Not so with this Government.
So change is in the
air. Opposition should be responsible in its approach.
Yes they should question Government, even make them
feel uncomfortable. They should oppose on matters
of principle or policy. But to oppose simply to bring
a Government down is to betray the people and to destabilise
an already precarious system.
Government too has
to be responsible. They should be honour bound to
consult through Parliamentary procedures. They should
allow the opposition time to question and to probe.
They should seek to involve the opposition in the
decision making process wherever possible.
With recent announcements
I hope that we are starting to do that. We are bringing
in opposition members to chair and run oversight committees
that will scrutinise the work of the Government. We
are also freeing up the media and opening up Government
to the scrutiny of the people.
For my part I seek
to inform and consult with the President as widely
as possible. I believe our regular discussions continue
to probe the ways of seeking greater consensus between
two leaders from different political parties.
I hope that we can
build on these and bring dignity and honour back to
our political system. It will, nevertheless, be a
long hard road to change attitudes and approaches.
On one issue I publicly
request the support of all our politicians. Seeking
to resolve the Peace Process should not be a partisan
matter. War and the resolution to peace should not
become an opportunity to destabilise a Government.
To do so is to betray the people and to put lives
in jeopardy. The end result could be too horrific.
I urge all of our politicians to put aside their differences
on this one matter and to support the Government in
finding the way forward to a lasting peace.
I would like to turn
to one final issue that is of great concern to many
of you, overcoming the problems that have hampered
our ability to implement the foreign assistance that
has been provided in the past. It is fair to ask,
Why does Sri Lanka need a significant increase in
assistance if we are not sure whether it can be utilized
effectively?
The shortcomings in
the implementation process are one of the key impediments
in our negotiations with the LTTE. They must be overcome
if we are to build a lasting peace and provide the
improved economic opportunities and substantially
reduce poverty throughout Sri Lanka.
The Government has
taken a number of important steps to improve the system
for project implementation and we have made significant
progress during the last 18 months. But there are
fundamental problems with the system that cannot be
overcome with procedural patches. Our public service
is too large, too poorly paid and lacks the capacity
to handle the increased rates of project design and
implementation.
So today I can tell
you that the Government is introducing a completely
new organization that will also incorporate the External
Resources Department. It will be responsible for all
of the tasks of implementing foreign funded projects.
It will ensure a timely and professional tendering
process. And it will have the ability to bring in
the best qualified individuals and firms from outside
government to manage and implement projects. Transparency
and accountability will be significantly improved.
This new system will
provide the basis for substantial improvements in
the utilization of the assistance necessary for the
reconstruction and rehabilitation in the North East
and the other conflict affected areas. It will also
provide the foundation for the economic transformation
of Sri Lanka that will raise incomes and reduce poverty
throughout the country.
We know that these
changes will not be easy, nor will they be popular
with everyone. There are some that have a stake in
the current approach. But the stakes for Sri Lanka
are too high not to take these necessary steps and
to do so quickly. This new system can be in place
before the end of this year and then it will be implementation,
implementation, implementation.
However, to design
and introduce this new system in the next seven months,
will require the active support and cooperation of
the donor community. We will, for example, need guidance
in identifying the most efficient procedures and international
best practices. We will also need assistance in training
and equipping the staff that will operate this new
system.
So in your deliberations
over the next two days I hope you will see that we
demonstrate the determination to see this project
through.
On peace we shall
never give up and our sincerity will never be in doubt.
On the economy we are pushing ahead with our plans
and our resolve is clear for you to see from our actions
in the last year. Politically we face many challenges
but we are dealing with each in a systematic way.
On implementation our own frustration is driving us
to seek innovative solutions.
For many years now
I have had a clear view of the sort of Sri Lanka I
wish to see. One where the people are living in a
free, tolerant, peaceful society. One where everyone
shares in the benefits of a prosperous economy and
one where the values of our culture can shine through
for the world to see.
Eighteen months ago
and at the start of my premiership I spoke to our
people that the challenge of the Government was to
grow a garden of fresh flowers in a field of thorns.
For the sake of our
children let the flowers blossom once more.
With your help I know
that we can deliver.
Thank you.
|