| |
 |
| |
| Moving
Ahead : Relief, Rehabilitation and Reconciliation |
| |
| |
| I. Introduction |
Purpose of this Document |
This documents
contains a compilation of programmes and projects,
and their respective financial outlay, that have been
committed by the donor community to the relief, rehabilitation,
reconciliation and socio-economic development of the
conflict-affected areas of Sri Lanka. The compilation
was undertaken between September 10 - 21, 2002. As
far as possible, only programmes and projects for
which firm financing commitments have been made or
are reflected in firm donor pipelines are included
in the compilation.
The main purpose of the compilation is to provide
both the Government of Sri Lanka and the supporting
donor community with a picture of resources and commitments
that are immediately available for the development
effort in the conflicted-affected areas. Subsequently,
the compilation will be used in the preparation of
a detailed long-term needs assessment for the recovery
and development of the areas.
The compilation has been put together by a Working
Group composed of officers from the Government of
Sri Lanka, the Office of the United Nations Resident
Coordinator for Sri Lanka, and the Country Offices
of the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.
It is based on submissions from the respective donor
agencies. The various programmes and projects have
also been checked against the External Resources Department’s
database on relief, rehabilitation and reconciliation
programmes (Information for RRR Programme –
North East Provincial Council). The situation with
regard to donor assistance to the North and East is
changing daily. With the gearing up of the peace process
and following the Sri Lanka Investment Forum in mid-September
in New York, various donors have been promising more
funding. It, therefore, necessary to have regular
up-dates of this stocktaking exercise.
|
Background to the Triple-R Framework
and Needs Assessment |
Since December
2001 the peace process has moved forward with speed
and purpose. In February 2002, an agreement was reached
between the Government and the Liberation Tigers of
Tamil Eelam (LTTE) on a cessation of hostilities.
The Government has stepped up the implementation of
the National Framework for Relief, Rehabilitation
and Reconciliation (Triple-R). Government has also
intimated to the international donor community that
it would appreciate a stepped up effort of assistance
to the Triple-R policy and to development of the conflict-affected
areas in particular and the country in general.
This documents represents an initial bringing together
of the Triple-R and socio-economic development concept
of the Government with the International Assistance
Needs Assessment exercise. In the initial stages of
the peace process, the Government would like the Triple-R
and donor support to concentrate on four primary areas
that will bring maximum tangible returns in the conflict-affected
areas and also contribute the most to further reconciliation
and confidence building:
|
| • |
resettlement of internally
displaced persons (IDPs) and assistance to host
communities; |
| • |
rehabilitation and provision
of basic physical infrastructure (such as roads,
power, communication facilities, etc); |
| • |
restoration and improvement in
the provision of social and communal services
(such as health, education, sanitation, and judicial
services); |
| • |
social integration programmes. |
|
| It is recognised that to ensure the
sustainability of initiatives in the above priority
areas, they will also have to be complemented by some
major initiatives in the areas of: |
| • |
reconciliation; |
| • |
restoration of good governance,
coordination, planning and implementation capacity;
and |
| • |
the sustainable development
of productive economic sectors and employment. |
|
| Thus the donors’ initial commitments
as set out in this document represent a form of “laying
on the table” of the donor community’s tangible
commitments to assist the Government and the people
of Sri Lanka to achieve lasting peace and sustainable
development. It will indeed be the basis for further
needs assessments and commitment of additional resources
for the socio-economic development of the country. |
| |
| |
|
| |
Summary of Commitments
|
Multilateral
Donors
|
Multilateral commitments
amount to around US$ 277 million. The Asian Development
Bank, World Bank and the organisations of the United
Nations family have committed about US$ 260 million
to programmes in the conflict-affected areas either
in specific on-going projects in the area or as part
of the national programmes: |
| • |
ADB |
$ |
133 million |
| • |
World Bank |
$ |
77 million |
| • |
UN Agencies and Programmes: |
$ |
51 million |
|
| The European Union has committed about US$ 16 million. |
| |
Bilateral
Donors
|
An initial compilation
from 9 bilateral donors has commitments amounting
to over US$ about 53 million. |
| |
| |
II. Summary of Multilateral Donor Commitments
|
Donor |
US$
million |
| Ongoing |
Firm Pipeline |
Total Amount |
| A |
Asian Development
Bank |
54.200 |
79.000 |
133.200 |
| B |
World Bank |
37.000 |
40.000 |
77.00 |
| C |
European Union
|
15.900 |
|
15.900 |
| D |
United Nations Agencies
and Programmes |
33.056 |
17.706 |
50.762 |
1 |
FAO |
|
0.800 |
0.800 |
2 |
UNDP |
3.030 |
|
3.030 |
3 |
UNFPA |
0.030 |
|
0.030 |
4 |
ILO |
0.155 |
4.156 |
4.311 |
5 |
WFP |
22.800 |
|
22.800 |
6 |
WHO |
0.580 |
|
0.580 |
7 |
IMO |
0.175 |
|
0.175 |
8 |
UNICEF |
2.629 |
|
2.629 |
9 |
UNHCR |
3.657 |
12.750 |
16.407 |
| |
|
|
|
| TOTAL MULTILATERAL |
140.433 |
136.706 |
276.862 |
|
| |
| * Based on information collated as
at September 21, 2002 |
| |
| |
III. Bilateral Donor Commitments
|
Donor |
US$
million |
| Ongoing |
Firm
Pipeline |
Total
Amount |
| A |
Japan – JICA |
5.099 |
|
5.099 |
| B |
Germany – GTZ |
8.520 |
|
8.520 |
| C |
Australia – AusAID |
0.789 |
0.250 |
1.039 |
| D |
Netherlands |
5.343 |
|
5.343 |
| E |
Sweden – SIDA |
3.460 |
|
3.460 |
| F |
United States – AID |
3.000 |
|
3.000 |
| G |
United Kingdom – DFID |
15.239 |
|
15.239 |
| H |
Norway – NORAD |
7.171 |
2.705 |
9.876 |
| I |
Canada – CIDA |
1.580 |
|
1.580 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| TOTAL
BILATERAL |
50.201 |
2.955 |
53.156 |
|
| |
| Based on information collated as at
September 21, 2002 |
| |
| |
|
| |
Source:
UNDP |
| |
|
|