A presentation titled “Misrepresentations of Sri Lanka: A Briefing on Human Rights”, was held on Thursday 20th September from 13:15 to 15:15 in Room XXIV at the Palais des Nations. It was chaired by H.E. Dr. Dayan Jayaytilleka.Over 60 representatives of mainly civil society organizations attended.

The speakers were: Professor Rajiva Wijesinha, Secretary General of the Secretariat for Coordinating the Peace Process, Ms. Shirani Goonetilleke, Director Legal, Secretariat for Coordinating the Peace Process and Mr. Shavindra Fernando, Deputy Solicitor General, Attorney General’s Department. Each speaker made a statement of about10 minutes.

Professor Rajiva Wijesinha stated that the issues of Internally Displaced Persons and cases of abductions and disappearances had been misrepresented and highlighted by certain parties both in   Sri Lanka and abroad. While admitting that there were real issues of concern, he insisted on the fact that a number of allegations made against the government were not well founded.

The almost exemplary conduct of the Sri Lankan Army during the recapture of the Eastern Province and its continuously improving human rights record are cases in point. Drawing particular attention to the need for objective criticism, Prof. Wijesinha invited the NGOs not to unfairly tarnish Sri Lanka’s image but to cooperate with it genuinely in improving its human rights situation.

He described the role and the function of the Peace Secretariat in both rectifying misrepresentations and in requesting for information for the clarification of alleged and potential human rights violations.

Professor Rajiva Wijesinha said that Sri Lanka faced both a political and a terrorist problem and that they required new and imaginative solutions.

Ms. Shirani Goonetilleke, Director Legal of the Peace Secretariat (SCOPP) described the role of the All Party Representative Committee as well as the progress made in establishing a witness protection and victim assistance programme.

She explained that four officials were in Australia undergoing practical training so that they can become trainers once they return to Sri Lanka. She said that the trainers had been drawn for their wide and varied experience and contacts in all parts of the criminal justice system.

Ms. Goonetilleke also drew attention to certain difficulties that the Sri Lankan state has to face when trying to reach its goals: lack of funds and the absence of legislature, etc. Moreover, delicate and complex issues such as those that Sri Lanka has been facing need careful analysis, thus, time.

Referring to the Northern Ireland peace process, she noted how the parties involved needed 2 years to find an acceptable solution. In the case of the Sri Lankan APRC, it is now on the verge of coming out with a solution after intense deliberations during the past 12 months.

Ms. Goonetilleke also spoke about the SCOPP’s engagement in child soldier rehabilitation (with the assistance of UNICEF), the obstacles they face in this respect and the achievements they have made so far. She stated that the SCOPP’s objective is to help these children be integrated into the society by giving them proper education, vocational training, etc.

Ms. Goonetilleke also described the steps taken by the Peace Secretariat along with UNICEF to rehabilitate child soldiers.

Next the Deputy Solicitor General Mr. Shavindra Fernando described in detail the role of the Attorney General and his Department in Sri Lanka which he said was not a political office and did not initiate or lead investigations.

He was responding to a recent public statement issued by The International Group of Eminent Persons (IIGEP) in which it had expressed its concern regarding four areas of the work of the Commission of Inquiry: slowness of the process, the Attorney General’s involvement in the process, the lack of a Victim and Witness protection programme and the inadequate disclosure of information.

Evoking the second cause of concern, Mr. Fernando explained in detail the Attorney General’s role in the Sri Lankan judicial system and the COI. He noted the importance of understanding the Attorney General’s role in the local context before commenting on it from the point of view of the international community. The Attorney General does not intervene in the COI unless his support was asked for, and if requested, he could even withdraw his staff and services from the COI.

Mr. Fernando noted that the third cause of concern of the IIGEP, i.e., the establishment of a Victim and Witness Protection Programme, has already been addressed.

The statements by the panelists were followed by a question and answer session.